What company filings say about tariff risk
10-Q disclosure of 301 exposure
Tariffs, budgets, the debt ceiling and the courts: where Washington policy meets the markets.
10-Q disclosure of 301 exposure
Discrimination statute as tariff tool
Two-tier rates plus exemptions
Legal basis change, similar rate
Refunds swell bill supply
Decomposing two supply shocks
Appeal keeps duties live
Statutory expiry of Section 122
Full-value 232 hits finished goods
Section 301 replaces emergency powers
Litigation as tariff-avoidance strategy
Downstream buyers claim refunds
Metal-content basis replaced
Refund order vs rate increase
Section 122 as temporary bridge
Legal regime break in tariff series
Refund risk on ~$30bn monthly receipts
Event study of reversals
Security aims via trade threats
Customs receipts fund deficit
Food tariff rollback
Unrecovered federal activity
Refund exposure if IEEPA falls
Tariff cut for export-control pause
Shutdown halts statistics
Exemption tied to US plants
Appointments shift reaction function
Appellate loss threatens receipts
Governance risk lifts long end
Secondary tariff on rupee assets
Statistical agency independence
Tariff design shapes arbitrage
Tariffed categories reprice first
Investment pledges as tariff price
Duties ÷ imports as realised rate
Unilateral rate notices
TGA rebuild drains reserves
Pass-through timing
Input cost surge for fabricators
Legal uncertainty as volatility factor
Inventory buffers delay pass-through
AI capex insensitive to trade shock
Prohibitive tariffs halt bilateral trade
Bilateral deficits as tariff rates
Reciprocal tariff scenario tree