The Lombard Review

3.3% growth: too good to be true?

23 Wall Street (foreground) and 15 Broad Street (background) in the Financial District of Manhattan, New York.
23 Wall Street (foreground) and 15 Broad Street (background) in the Financial District of Manhattan, New York. Photo: Arild Vågen/Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

The US economy capped 2023 with a spectacular flourish, expanding at an annualized clip of 3.3 per cent in the fourth quarter and utterly pulverizing consensus expectations of a slowdown. The headline figure was celebrated as definitive proof that the United States has achieved macroeconomic escape velocity. Yet quantitative analysts who decompose the output data find reasons for intellectual caution.

The Frankfurt Stock Exchange.
The Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Photo: Ank Kumar/Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

Decomposing the Boom

Decomposing the GDP figure reveals that a massive surge in net exports, government consumption outlays, and residual inventory accumulation contributed disproportionately to the headline print. Meanwhile, total aggregate hours worked in the private economy barely budged, implying a sudden, miraculous leap in non-farm labor productivity. If productivity has genuinely structurally stepped higher, non-inflationary growth can continue; if the data is flattered by residual deflators, a payback looms.

The former Banco Nacional de México building.
The former Banco Nacional de México building. Photo: Luis Alvaz/Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

A headline 3.3 per cent GDP print is a stunning statistical achievement, but an output boom powered by government spending and productivity anomalies warrants careful analytical skepticism.

Write to The Lombard Review at contact@thelombardreview.com

More From The Lombard Review