The Lombard Review

What is the "right" interest rate anyway?

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Photo: Kidfly182/Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

As the benchmark ten-year Treasury yield surged toward 4.35 per cent, touching levels not seen since 2007, fixed-income markets were forced to confront an uncomfortable conceptual question: what if the natural, non-inflationary real rate of interest—the elusive r-star—has drifted structurally higher? For a decade following the financial crisis, central bankers assumed that secular stagnation had permanently depressed the neutral rate to zero.

The Chicago Board of Trade Building, a skyscraper in Chicago.
The Chicago Board of Trade Building, a skyscraper in Chicago. Photo: Ken Lund/Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 2.0

The Structural Shift

That paradigm is disintegrating. The massive capital demands of the global energy transition, structural defence spending, supply-chain reshoring, and chronic fiscal deficits suggest that the demand for capital has outpaced the global supply of savings. If the real neutral rate has risen from zero to two per cent, policy rates at 5.5 per cent are only moderately restrictive rather than suffocating.

An afterburner glows on an F-15 Eagle engine during a test run after a repair, November 10, 2010.
An afterburner glows on an F-15 Eagle engine during a test run after a repair, November 10, 2010. Photo: Shelley Gill/Wikimedia Commons · Public domain

If the neutral rate of interest has drifted permanently higher, bond investors waiting for a return to the low-yield environment of the 2010s are anchoring their portfolios to a world that no longer exists.

Write to The Lombard Review at contact@thelombardreview.com

More From The Lombard Review